He posts here andhere. Lots of peculiar things.
(I)
There's no _objective _reason to view your or my political views as being superior to those of any other person.
There is no objective reason. Period. Reasons are always held by a person, hence subjective. My reason to write this post is mine and no one else's.
What Sumner appears to want there is 'something that forces someone to believe in something'. But there are no such things. Arguments can be more or less persuasive, but as far as I know, there ar…
Readers of this blog will have noticed that I tend to post lots of charts in a few posts. There's a reason for that.
For most questions we ask there are many interpretations. For example, drawing from my recent posts, we could ask "Does communism work?". And there we go into "But what do we mean by communism?", "What do we mean by work?".
Then we get into "Which countries count as communist?", "Which measures should we used to think about 'working'?", "…
The posts I've written about Soviet economic history, collected in one place. Best enjoyed if you listen to the Soviet anthem -best anthem ever- at the same time.
I haven't written a proper introduction, but Spufford's Red Plenty could serve as an accessible one. If you want a more advanced book, read Kornai's The Socialist System.
The Soviet Union: GDP growth
The Soviet Union: Healthcare
The Soviet Union: Brief remarks on the transition
The Soviet Union: Work and retirement
The Soviet Union: The fo…
'Friendly AI' is a field of research with the goal of ensuring that if and when a general purpose artificial intelligence (especially with greater than human intelligence) is developed, it won't be harmful to us.
I think there are some problems with this. I write this post in part to attract people who want to say why I am wrong, and why Friendly AI research would actually be useful.
First, if you want an introduction to what this is all about, read Superintelligence by Nick Bostrom. He explains the concept…
[Part of the Soviet Union series]
In this post, I cover food and nutrition in the Soviet Union. What were the Soviets eating?
... It's complicated
(I) The Paradox
I begin with one chart:
(This post deals with the post-1960 period)
So the Soviets were seemingly eating more calories than the Americans right almost until the end of the Soviet Union. Given that some people thought of the Soviet Union as a place stricken with famines and widespread queuing, this may look surprising. (Actually, the last famine i…
Cohen's d is one of the most popular measures of effect size out there. It happens sometimes that Cohen's d is not accurately translated into our intuitions of how relevant soething is. Here I will explain it with a few charts.
Cohen's d measures effect size, which a standarised measure of the difference between two distributions. In the case of Cohen's d,
That's the difference between two distribution's means, over a pooled standard deviation, and it looks like this:
Let's look at some examples.
First, he…