Contribute to the public good that is this blog
A Fine Theorem
Bleeding Heart Libertarians
Capitalism's Cradle (Anton Howes)
Clear language, clear mind (Emil Kirkegaard)
Greg Mankiw's Blog
Ideas - David Friedman
Juan Ramón Rallo
MIT Technology Review
Nada es Gratis
Next Big Future
Random Critical Analysis
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Slate Star Codex
Social Democracy for the 21st Century
Thing of Things
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Splintered Mind
In my previous post here I explained why the Google memo is fundamentally right in its factual claims about the broad population, which in turn explains the proportion of women in Google itself. Here I discuss some arguments against what has already been explained.
It is, and it is not sexist.
Enough manipulation with the definition of man, and freedom can be made to mean whatever the manipulator wishes (Matt Zwolinski)
John Rawls (1921 – 2002) was one of the most important philosophers in the History of modern political philosophy. Robert Nozick, who is broadly considered an intellectual rival of Rawls even wrote that “political philosophers must work within Rawls’s conceptual framework or explain why they don’t”. Rawls also ended the reign of utilitarianism as the most popular moral framework in academia, reintroducing deontology – one that directly draws from Kant, no less – into intellectual discourse.
In this article, I will put forward a few problems that Rawls’s philosophical project had. The problems are severe enough to put Rawls (or, at least the early Rawls) outside of liberalism itself.
I wrote four articles about Rawls a while ago in Spanish, which you can view in the Articles section. Here I’ve collected the best of them and added some extra bits, and translated them.
Collection of papers and articles that I’ve spotted since my previous links post that seem interesting.
Kenneth Arrow wrote a paper in 1963, Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. This paper tends to appear in debates regarding whether healthcare can be left to the market (like bread), or if it should feature heavy state involvement. Here I explain what the paper says, and to what extent it is true.