The standard argument against full egalitarianism is the Levelling Down Objection (LDO). What if there is an argument for egalitarianism that turns the LDO on its head?
It is usually asserted by thoughtful people that what matters is poverty, not inequality. Inequality would only matter only as far as it engenders bad consequences, as some researchers have tried to show. So far I'm unconvinced of the strongest claims (Sorry, Pickett & Wilkinson).
But Branko Milanovic presented here an argument defending…
Hace unos meses, esto que escribí recibió una crítica aquí. No me convenció la crítica, y aquí explicaré por qué. Recomiendo leer antes el primer artículo y la crítica antes de leer este, pues aquí iré citando de la réplica y respondiendo, sin repetir lo que ya dije.
Argumentaré que la defensa de la ética de libertad de Francisco Capella, aún conduciendo a conclusiones plausibles y estando en gran medida de acuerdo con ellas, es en última instancia errónea, poco rigurosa, y falaz, siendo la formulación de …
In the past, slavery was a common practise, as was holding women and homosexuals in a lower moral standing. Violence was seen as honorable, and war and torture were more common. Values tended to be more communitarian/collectivist, and tradition was something that was highly respected.
Also, during the Industrial Revolution, (some) people in Europe went through a change in values ('burgeois virtues') that is known be a key to explain why it happened first in Europe, but not in China.
Here I present some theo…
Here I will try to list everything Scott has written that is relevant to understand his ethics. I imagine his views have changed along time, and the final authority on what Scott thinks is Scott, so if he has any objection to his previous selves' thoughts, he wins. One could think that the topic begins and ends with his Consequentialist FAQ, written in 2011. But one would be wrong.
For some things I provide paragraphs, or comments. In all cases, you don't need to read the comment section, I've already copyp…
Hume famously said that reason is and ought to be the slave of the passions. Humeans are moral non-cognitivists (emotivists, in particular), and believe moral judgements are, ultimately, just sentiments. "Inequality is bad" or "Agression is bad" wouldn't mean anything, but would just express attitudes (Boo inequality!, Ugh violence!).
There are some Humeans in the net among people I read. Here they are:
Our first Humean is Chris Dillow, who writes
Nor is it obvious that the emotions whi…
How many Austrian economists are out there? Here I present a list of them.
In a previous post (spanish), I listed some Austrian work published in listed (JCR) journals.
First, who counts as an Austrian economist? I rely on these two conditions:
Have published in an Austrian journal, not in a guest or special review, but because of a particular interest in Austrian themes
Cite positively and use meaningfully, Austrian theory and/or authors
Would anyone else think they are/are not Austrian? (Given this, feel…