| 2019-09-02 | What useful fundamental physics are we missing? | I wrongly said that neutrino oscillations have no practical application | $2 | Lee Pavlevich |
| 2019-11-17 | NA | Mistake: Trusting 'Why We Sleep' too much. This mistake is hard to phrase because I wasn't committed to any object level claim, with the possible exception of 'every animal sleeps' | NA | Alexey Guzey's review |
| 2019-12-01 | On the causal powers of mormonism | Various mistakes related to incomplete sources and a paper I should have cited on suicide rates for LDS church members that I did not | $14 | Personal email (Alison Hugh) |
| 2020-02-25- | The Longevity FAQ | Various mistakes around my description of the early history of C. Elegans research + other things outlined in the changelogs there. The actual rate I would have paid is less than $60 but I decided to make a special exception. The money was donated to SENS. | $60* | Laura Deming, personal email |
| 2020-04-15 | Progress in semiconductors | I failed to appreciate the important of wire delay, overplayed the role of the memory bottleneck. | $24 | Andrew Clough, personal email |
| 2020-09-10 | Bloom's two sigma | Being too optimistic about Success for All, even if that was in the Questions section (Which was more speculative in nature) | $4 | Michael Goldstein (personal email) |
| 2021-01-08 | The Non-Non Libertarian FAQ, Kenneth Arrow on the welfare economics of medical care | Exact mistakes are listed on the Arrow page, along with my comments on them | $50 | The reddit user known as LordeRoyale |
| 2021-06-17 | Epigenetic clocks: a review | I claimed that some results obtained with Horvath's clock are general (for every reasonable measure of epigenetic age) whereas in fact these don't always show up in other clocks. | $20 | Morgan Levine |
| 2022-02-12 | Talent: a review | As explained in the EDIT in the post, now I support reference checks | A drink next time we meet lol | Armand Cognetta |
| 2022-02-17 | Epigenetic clocks: a review | Forgot to cite a key paper and wrongly said one paper was published in 2015 rather than 2013 | $4 | Bobby Brooke |
| 2022-09-07 | Set Sail for Fail: On AI risk | Wrongly said that chimpanzees have better working memory than humans based on a single piece of evidence, where there is a review from earlier in 2022 that shows otherwise | $64 | Nathan Nguyen |
| 2024-04-26 | Links (86) | I cited a a study that said that many Instagram and Tiktok users regret the platforms exist. That study is not very good for reasons here but I do think the conclusion is sufficiently directionally correct from alternative evidence here | $4 | Nathan Nguyen |
| 2026-02-15 | The Rise and Fall of Rawlsianism | I claimed Rawls abandoned the difference principle because not every rational agent behind the veil of ignorance would choose it. But Rawls never denied that there is one uniquely rational choice in the original position; it was actual citizens in liberal societies, not the parties to the original position, who he later said would come to different conclusions about principles of justice. | $40 | Joel da Silva |
| 2026-09-08 | Alzheimer's: from causes and risk factors to models and interventions | I claimed that people with mutations like APOE3 Christchurch do not experience cognitive decline. The cited study (Arboleda-Velasquez et al. 2019) reported one PSEN1 mutation carrier with two copies of APOE3 Christchurch who developed mild cognitive impairment in her seventies, approximately three decades later than expected. This was delayed onset, not an absence of cognitive decline. | $10 | Teagan Doherty |
| 2026-09-08 | Systems Biology: understanding beyond genes | I incorrectly described Mintz and Illmensee (1975) as transferring cancer-cell nuclei into oocytes and producing mice entirely from cancer cells. They injected whole teratocarcinoma cells into blastocysts, producing chimeras. Replaced the citation with Hochedlinger et al. (2004), which used nuclear transfer but also produced chimeric mice, and removed the inaccurate claim of subsequent replications. | — | — |
| 2026-09-08 | From chaos, order: On the nature and measurement of biological aging | I claimed that no epigenetic predictor of intrinsic capacity existed, but Fuentealba et al. had published one on June 4, 2025, before my article. Added the citation. | — | Teagan Doherty |
| 2026-09-08 | From chaos, order: On the nature and measurement of biological aging | I incorrectly assigned a greater-than-99% probability to surviving from age 10 to 80. I intended to compare one-year survival (10 to 11 versus 100 to 101). Clarified the time horizons and replaced the 50% figure at age 100 with approximately 63% for males and 67% for females, using the SSA's 2023 period life table. | — | Teagan Doherty |